Using a DIY lease template or recycling an old agreement for your commercial property might seem practical, but it can create significant challenges down the track. I work with landlords who've discovered that their lease terms don't actually account for their property's characteristics - and these mismatches between standard clauses and property realities cause frustrating disputes that could have been prevented.
The challenge with templates and old leases is straightforward: they contain generic terms written for standard situations. They don't consider how your particular property actually functions - its physical characteristics, operational realities, cost structure, or practical constraints - and how these characteristics should shape lease provisions.
Let's look at why property characteristics matter for lease terms, and how to ensure your lease provisions actually fit your property's reality.
What you need to know about commercial lease drafting:
Think carefully about how your property's characteristics should influence lease terms before using a template or old agreement. Standard maintenance clauses, outgoings provisions, alteration permissions, and make-good requirements don't account for whether your property has shared systems, aging equipment, unmetered services, structural constraints, or common facilities with unequal benefits. Work with a commercial lease lawyer to draft provisions tailored to your property's actual physical condition, operational realities, cost structure, and practical limitations. Ensure lease terms reflect how your premises actually functions rather than applying one-size-fits-all clauses written for generic situations. Consider your property's age, existing wear, shared infrastructure, compliance requirements, and how costs actually arise - these characteristics should directly shape the obligations and allocations in your lease. The cost of properly tailored lease terms is far less than the cost of disputes when standard provisions don't fit your property's reality.
Commercial and retail leases aren't just paperwork - they're long-term legal agreements that define who's responsible for what, how costs are handled, and what happens when expectations don't align. When a lease is drafted clearly and comprehensively, both landlord and tenant can focus on the business relationship. When it's vague or incomplete, misunderstandings are almost inevitable.
I've worked with landlords who thought their lease protected them, only to discover during a dispute that the lease terms didn't actually reflect the characteristics and realities of their property. The template or old lease they'd used simply didn't account for how their particular premises actually functions.
Consider a landlord leasing commercial space in a converted heritage building. The property had shared plumbing and electrical systems serving multiple tenancies, 40-year-old HVAC equipment, heritage restrictions on external modifications, and unmetered water supply.
The landlord used a template commercial lease with standard provisions: "tenant responsible for internal maintenance," "tenant pays proportionate share of outgoings," "alterations with landlord consent," and "restore to original condition at lease end."
Problems emerged quickly. The aging HVAC system failed - the template said the tenant maintained internal equipment, but this shared building system served multiple tenancies. Was replacement a tenant or landlord cost? The lease didn't address shared system characteristics.
Water costs were significant because the tenant ran a café with substantial water usage. The template allocated costs by floor area, but the tenant argued this was unfair given disproportionate usage. The lease terms didn't account for unmetered supply characteristics.
The tenant wanted new signage, but heritage restrictions limited options regardless of the template's "consent not unreasonably withheld" clause. At lease end, "restore to original condition" created major disputes about what this meant for a 40-year-old property with visible existing wear.
These disputes resulted from lease terms that didn't account for property characteristics: shared systems, aging equipment, heritage constraints, cost structure, and existing condition. Properly tailored lease drafting would have addressed these characteristics upfront, preventing the disputes entirely.
The fundamental problem with template leases and recycled old agreements is that they contain standard terms written for generic situations. They don't consider the specific characteristics of your property and how those characteristics should shape lease provisions.
Your property's physical characteristics matter. Is it an older building requiring more maintenance? Does it have shared HVAC or plumbing systems? Are there common walls with adjoining tenancies? Is the space subdivided with internal demising walls? Does it have heritage features or structural limitations? These physical realities should directly influence maintenance obligations, alteration permissions, and repair responsibilities in the lease - but template leases use one-size-fits-all clauses.
Your property's operational characteristics matter. Does it share access with other tenancies? Are there common areas that need management and cost allocation? Does it have shared loading facilities or waste management? Are there parking limitations or competing demands for spaces? Are utilities separately metered or shared? How these operational aspects work should shape the lease terms about access, costs, and tenant responsibilities - but templates can't address specifics they don't know about.
Your property's condition and age matter. A brand new fit-out has different maintenance implications than a 30-year-old space. Aging equipment, worn flooring, dated fixtures - these existing conditions should affect what maintenance the tenant takes on, what repairs are landlord responsibilities, and what "make-good to original condition" actually means. Template leases use generic maintenance clauses that don't account for your property's actual state.
I see this disconnect regularly. A landlord uses a template lease with standard maintenance and repair clauses. The premises has particular characteristics - shared services, older equipment, common facilities - that create specific responsibilities and costs. The template lease terms don't address how these characteristics actually work. Disputes become inevitable when the standard lease terms don't fit the property's reality.
A template lease might have professionally-drafted clauses about maintenance, outgoings, and alterations. But if those clauses don't account for your property's actual characteristics, they create problems rather than preventing them.
Maintenance and repair terms that don't fit the property:
Outgoings provisions that don't match how costs actually arise:
Alteration and fit-out terms that ignore property limitations:
Make-good obligations that don't reflect property realities:
These aren't minor issues. When lease terms don't match property characteristics, every maintenance issue, cost recovery, or alteration request becomes a potential dispute about whether standard lease clauses actually apply to your specific situation.
Would you like to ensure your lease terms actually fit your property's characteristics? Let's work through the specifics together.
Let's look at what happens when landlords use template leases or recycle old agreements that don't account for their property's specific characteristics and how those characteristics should shape lease terms.
Template leases typically have standard clauses like "tenant responsible for internal maintenance and repairs" or "landlord maintains structure and exterior." These generic terms don't account for how your particular property actually functions.
Properties with shared building systems need specific allocation of responsibilities. If your HVAC, plumbing, or electrical systems serve multiple tenancies, who maintains what components? Who pays when shared equipment needs servicing or replacement? How are emergency repairs coordinated when they affect multiple tenants? Template maintenance clauses don't address these shared system realities.
Older properties have different maintenance dynamics than new ones. If the premises has 20-year-old equipment, worn flooring, or aging fixtures, standard "tenant maintains in good condition" clauses create unreasonable expectations. The lease needs maintenance terms that account for the property's age and existing condition - what's reasonable maintenance versus what's actually replacement of aging components that's a landlord responsibility.
Properties with common areas need clear allocation of maintenance responsibilities and costs. Who maintains shared corridors, bathrooms, loading areas, or outdoor spaces? How are these costs recovered? If some tenants benefit more from certain common areas than others, how is that reflected in cost allocation? Template outgoings clauses typically don't address these nuances.
I've worked with landlords whose template lease created ongoing disputes because maintenance obligations didn't account for shared systems, aging equipment, or common facilities. Every repair issue became an argument about who was responsible because the lease terms didn't reflect how the property actually works.
Most template leases have standard outgoings definitions and recovery mechanisms. But how costs arise in your property depends on its specific characteristics.
Properties with shared but unmetered services can't use standard "tenant pays proportionate share of actual costs" provisions when you can't measure individual usage. If water, gas, or electricity isn't separately metered to each tenancy, the lease needs terms that address how these shared costs are fairly allocated - not template clauses that assume separate metering exists.
Properties with unequal common area benefits need cost allocation that reflects actual usage patterns. If some tenants have extensive frontage or exclusive use of certain common areas while others don't, standard "proportionate to leased area" formulas may not be fair. The lease terms need to account for your property's specific layout and how different tenancies actually use shared spaces.
Properties with variable cost profiles need outgoings provisions tailored to what costs actually occur. Some properties have significant landscaping and external maintenance costs; others have complex building management systems; some have intensive security or waste management needs. Template outgoings clauses often use generic categories that don't match your property's actual cost structure.
When outgoings provisions don't reflect property characteristics, you end up in disputes about what's recoverable, how costs should be allocated, and whether the formula used is actually fair given the property's realities.
Template leases typically say something like "tenant may make non-structural alterations with landlord consent, not to be unreasonably withheld." This generic language doesn't address your property's specific characteristics that affect what alterations are feasible or appropriate.
Older buildings with structural constraints need alteration clauses that address these limitations upfront. If your property has limited load-bearing capacity, heritage features, or shared structural elements, the lease should specify what types of alterations simply aren't possible - not leave this for dispute when the tenant proposes changes.
Properties with shared infrastructure need alteration provisions that address coordination requirements. If any alterations could affect adjoining tenancies' access to services, shared systems, or common areas, the lease needs terms about approval processes, impact assessments, and protection of other tenants' interests.
Properties with specific compliance requirements need alteration clauses that reference these constraints. If your building has heritage overlays, environmental requirements, or specialized approvals that affect what changes can be made, these limitations should be clear in the lease terms.
I see problems when tenants propose alterations that seem reasonable based on generic lease clauses, but aren't actually feasible given the property's characteristics. Clear lease terms that account for property-specific constraints prevent these situations.
"Tenant to make good and restore premises to original condition at lease end" - this template clause appears in countless leases. But what "original condition" means depends entirely on your property's actual state and characteristics.
Older properties with existing wear can't reasonably be "restored to original condition" as if they were new. If the premises had worn carpet, dated fixtures, or aging equipment at lease commencement, the lease needs make-good terms that account for this - not generic restoration language that implies like-new condition.
Properties where tenant improvements add value need make-good provisions that address this reality. If the tenant installs quality fixtures or makes improvements that enhance the property, does your generic "remove all tenant improvements" clause actually serve your interests? Sometimes retaining certain improvements benefits both parties - but template clauses don't address this scenario.
Properties with specific end-of-lease condition requirements need these documented clearly. If you need specific cleaning standards, repairs to particular areas, or restoration of certain features based on your property's actual characteristics and intended future use, generic make-good clauses won't capture this.
When make-good terms don't reflect property realities, end-of-lease disputes are almost guaranteed. The landlord expects restoration based on template language, the tenant points to actual property age and condition, and resolution becomes costly.
Ready to ensure your lease terms actually match your property's characteristics? Let's discuss how your premises actually functions and what lease provisions make sense.
DIY leases often underweight landlord protections in favour of keeping things simple. This creates exposure when tenant circumstances change.
Personal guarantees ensure that if your corporate tenant defaults, you have recourse to the individual directors or shareholders. Without this protection, a tenant can simply wind up their company and walk away from lease obligations.
Security deposits or bank guarantees provide you with funds to cover unpaid rent, repair costs, or make-good obligations if the tenant doesn't fulfill them. Template leases may not specify adequate security amounts or may lack clear provisions about when and how you can access these funds.
Maintenance obligations need to be spelled out clearly - what's the tenant responsible for versus what you'll handle as landlord. Vague language like "tenant maintains premises" creates arguments about who should pay for particular repairs.
I've seen landlords discover too late that their lease doesn't give them the basic protections they assumed were standard. These provisions should be tailored to your property type and tenant risk profile.
This is more common than you'd think. The difference between a commercial lease and a retail lease under NSW law isn't just semantic - it affects your legal obligations and the tenant's rights.
A retail lease falls under the Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) if the premises are used wholly or predominantly for retail purposes. This triggers specific disclosure requirements, minimum term provisions, and restrictions on rent review mechanisms that don't apply to standard commercial leases.
Using a commercial lease template for retail premises can put you in breach of these requirements. Using a retail lease template for commercial premises may give the tenant protections they're not entitled to and restrict your landlord rights unnecessarily.
The lease classification needs to match the actual permitted use of the premises.
End-of-lease disputes over property condition are one of the most common problems I handle. The issue almost always traces back to vague or incomplete make-good clauses.
"Good condition," "fair wear and tear excepted," "tenant to restore premises" - these phrases sound clear until you try to apply them. What counts as fair wear and tear? Does "restore" mean remove all tenant improvements or leave functional ones in place? What standard of cleanliness and repair is "good condition"?
Without specific definitions and processes, you and your tenant can both be entirely reasonable people and still end up in complete disagreement about what's required at lease end.
Make-good provisions need to specify:
Ready to ensure your make-good obligations are documented clearly? Let's discuss your specific property situation.
A commercial lease lawyer doesn't just fill in a template. We draft provisions that account for your property's specific characteristics and how those characteristics should shape lease terms.
Professional lease drafting starts with understanding how your property actually functions - its physical condition, operational realities, and practical constraints.
We consider:
We draft maintenance and repair provisions that match your property's actual characteristics rather than using one-size-fits-all clauses.
For properties with shared systems, the lease specifies:
For older properties, maintenance clauses account for:
For properties with common areas, we document:
We create outgoings definitions and recovery mechanisms tailored to how costs actually arise in your property.
For properties with unmetered shared services, the lease addresses:
For properties where tenancies have unequal common area benefit, provisions consider:
For properties with specific cost profiles, outgoings clauses:
We draft alteration and fit-out provisions that account for your property's specific limitations and characteristics.
For properties with structural constraints, alteration clauses:
For properties with shared infrastructure, provisions address:
For properties with specialised compliance requirements, clauses reference:
We create make-good provisions that reflect your property's real condition and characteristics, not template assumptions.
This includes:
When lease terms match property characteristics, disputes about maintenance, costs, alterations, and end-of-lease obligations largely disappear. Both parties understand what's actually required because the lease provisions fit the property's reality.
I stay current with NSW leasing law requirements, court decisions that affect lease interpretation, and best practices in commercial and retail leasing. Your lease reflects this current understanding, not what was standard practice when a template was created.
For retail leases, this includes proper disclosure documentation, compliant rent review provisions, and termination clauses that meet statutory requirements. For commercial leases, it means ensuring your provisions are likely to be enforced as written if tested.
Legal drafting isn't about making things complicated - it's about making expectations clear enough that disputes don't arise. When they do arise, properly drafted provisions give you a solid foundation for resolution.
We define terms that commonly cause arguments. We specify procedures and timelines. We address scenarios that templates often miss: what happens if the tenant wants to make alterations, how outgoings are reconciled, what notice is required for different purposes, how disputes will be handled.
This clarity benefits both parties. Your tenant knows what they're committing to, and you have confidence that your lease actually says what you think it says.
Consider a landlord leasing retail premises in a small shopping complex. The landlord and tenant discussed and agreed on several specific arrangements: the tenant would have exclusive use of two designated car parks, access to a shared storage room upstairs, and permission for illuminated signage subject to council approval. The rent included outgoings except for the tenant's own electricity usage.
The landlord used an old lease from a previous tenant to "save time." The lease had generic descriptions of the premises and standard template clauses about parking and services.
Two years into the tenancy, problems emerged. Another tenant started using one of the "designated" car parks because they weren't specifically identified in the lease. The tenant wanted to access the storage room during evening restocking, but the lease had no provisions about after-hours access to common areas. When council rejected the illuminated signage, the tenant installed non-illuminated signage and the landlord objected - but the lease only said "signage subject to landlord approval and council consent," without specifying what type.
Most frustrating was the outgoings dispute. The landlord received a large common area maintenance bill and tried to recover the tenant's share. The tenant argued that "rent includes outgoings" based on their original discussion and understanding - but the lease had template outgoings clauses that required the tenant to pay a proportionate share. The landlord couldn't remember exactly what had been agreed two years earlier.
None of these people were being unreasonable. They'd reached genuine agreement on specific terms - but the lease didn't document what they'd actually agreed. The template lease addressed none of the property-specific arrangements because it had been written for a different premises in a different situation.
This landlord spent considerable time and money resolving disputes that wouldn't have occurred if the lease had properly documented the property specifics and negotiated terms from the start.
These situations happen regularly when leases don't match the actual premises or agreement. Proper lease drafting prevents them by capturing the specifics of your property and your deal.
Here's how to protect your commercial or retail property investment through proper lease preparation:
For new leases:
For existing leases:
Red flags requiring immediate attention:
When disputes arise about maintenance responsibilities, cost allocations, alteration permissions, or make-good obligations, they almost always trace back to lease terms that don't account for property characteristics. Getting lease provisions tailored to your property's reality from the start prevents these frustrating and costly situations.
Ready to protect your property investment with a well-drafted lease? Let's discuss your specific leasing situation and ensure your lease provides the protections you need.
I work with commercial and retail property landlords to draft leases with terms tailored to their property's specific characteristics. Having handled lease disputes throughout my practice, I understand how critical it is for lease provisions to account for property realities - shared systems, aging equipment, unmetered services, structural constraints, existing condition - rather than applying generic template terms that don't fit.
Whether you're leasing premises for the first time or you've identified that your current lease terms don't properly account for your property's characteristics, let's work through your specific situation. I offer fixed-fee lease drafting so you can ensure your lease provisions match your property's operational realities without uncertainty about legal costs.
Contact LexAlia Property & Commercial Law to discuss your commercial or retail lease needs. Together, we'll ensure your lease terms actually fit how your property functions rather than applying standard clauses that don't account for your premises' specific characteristics.
Email exchanges can create binding contracts if they contain clear agreement on all essential terms. The challenge is that email conversations often reference different versions of proposals, include conditional acceptance, or leave key terms "to be determined." If you're relying on emails as your documentation, make sure one message clearly sets out all essential terms and the other party's response clearly accepts those terms without conditions. Better still, document the agreed terms in a single clear document that both parties sign.
Start by checking your contract to understand what payment terms were agreed and what rights you have. Then send a professional written reminder referencing the specific invoice, due date, and your payment terms. Keep records of all communication. If that doesn't work, send a firmer follow-up outlining next steps. Most payment issues resolve with clear, documented communication before escalation is necessary.
The base filing fee with IP Australia starts around $330 for a single class filed online. Professional fees for trade mark searches, application preparation, and examination response typically range from $1,500 to $3,500 depending on complexity.
Yes, digital products require different refund and access provisions. Physical goods have straightforward return processes—customers send items back. Digital products can't be "returned" once downloaded or accessed. Your terms should address how you handle refunds for digital products, what access limits apply, and what happens if the product is defective. Australian Consumer Law allows some flexibility for digital products, but you need to be clear and fair in how you apply these provisions.
Templates provide a starting point, but they need significant customisation for your specific services. Generic templates often include inappropriate clauses or miss provisions critical for your business model. I work with service providers to develop agreements that are practical, enforceable, and aligned with how they actually work.
Yes, in most cases. Having retention of title terms in your contract creates a security interest under the PPSA, but that interest needs to be registered on the PPSR to be enforceable, particularly if your customer becomes insolvent. The contract creates the right, but registration is what makes it work when you need it. I can help you understand whether your specific contract terms create a registrable security interest and establish a process for registering new supplies.
Templates provide a starting point, but collaboration agreements should be tailored to your specific project and business structures. If significant revenue, intellectual property, or ongoing client relationships are involved, professional guidance helps ensure the agreement addresses your actual commercial arrangement.
Look at how the relationship actually operates, not just what you call it. Genuine contractors control how they complete work, provide their own equipment, work for multiple clients, and bear commercial risk. If you control their working hours, provide equipment and training, integrate them into your business structure, and they work exclusively for you, the relationship may be employment regardless of what the contract says. I can help you assess your specific situation and structure arrangements appropriately.
Templates provide starting points but rarely suit your specific circumstances without modification. Confidentiality agreements need to define precisely what information you're protecting, how it can be used, and how long obligations last. Generic templates often include vague definitions that make enforcement difficult or omit provisions that matter for your particular situation. Having an agreement reviewed before use ensures it actually protects what matters to you.
Templates provide a starting point, but they rarely fit your specific business operations without significant customisation. Working with a commercial lawyer ensures your terms accurately reflect how your business works and are enforceable under Australian law.
Yes, even small businesses benefit from clear website terms. If your site collects any data, processes payments, accepts bookings, or provides information, T&Cs help manage expectations and reduce legal risk. The complexity should match your business, but having no terms leaves you more exposed than having appropriate ones. We can work through what your specific situation requires.
Yes, you can offer incentives like discounts, free products, or competition entries to encourage reviews. The critical requirement is disclosure—the incentive must be disclosed clearly where the review appears. The incentive shouldn't be conditional on leaving a positive review specifically; it should be offered for honest feedback regardless of rating.
A company constitution sets out the basic legal framework for how your company operates - things like share classes, director powers, and meeting procedures. It's a public document lodged with ASIC that anyone can access. A shareholders agreement is a private commercial contract between shareholders addressing the practical aspects of business ownership - governance details, funding commitments, exit strategies, and dispute resolution. The constitution provides the legal structure; the shareholders agreement addresses the commercial realities of working together.
Modifying a template can address some issues, but there's significant risk. Templates don't prompt you to think about your property's characteristics and how those should influence lease terms. You might modify rent and term clauses, but miss how shared systems should affect maintenance provisions, how aging equipment should shape repair obligations, or how unmetered services should influence outgoings. Having a commercial lease lawyer review your modified template can identify these mismatches - but proper drafting that accounts for property characteristics from the start is often more effective.
Strata levies are calculated based on your lot's unit entitlement, which is determined by factors like lot size, value, or use. As a tenant, you'll typically pay the proportionate share of levies that the landlord passes on to you as outgoings under the lease. Your lease should specify whether you pay based on the lot's unit entitlement percentage or a floor area calculation. Always review the strata scheme's levy history to understand what you'll actually be paying beyond base rent.
"Subject to contract" language supports non-binding intent but doesn't guarantee it. Courts look at the document as a whole, including whether all essential terms are agreed, how the parties described their obligations, and how they behaved afterward. For strongest protection, combine this language with explicit statements that the document isn't binding.
Base rent is the fixed amount you pay for occupying the premises - it's the core rental component. Outgoings are additional costs for operating and maintaining the property, such as council rates, insurance, repairs and common area costs. This distinction matters because each component is calculated, reviewed and recovered differently, and understanding both is essential for accurately budgeting occupancy costs.
No, stamp duty in NSW is calculated on the market value of the property regardless of the amount paid. Even gifts attract full stamp duty liability unless specific exemptions apply. This is a common misconception that can result in unexpected costs.
For straightforward arrangements with established templates, documentation can be completed in a few days. More complex deals or those requiring negotiation on risk provisions might take 1-2 weeks. The timeline depends on how quickly both parties can review and approve terms, not just drafting time. If you need to move quickly, focus on getting core terms documented first, with more detailed provisions following shortly after. Let's discuss your specific timeline.
If your contract includes a suspension clause—stating that work can be paused if invoices remain unpaid—then yes, you can stop work. Without this provision in your contract, suspending work might put you in breach of contract yourself. This is why payment terms that specifically address suspension rights are so valuable. Let's discuss whether your current contracts give you this protection.
ASIC business name registration is separate from trade mark registration. You can technically register a business name that's identical to someone else's registered trade mark, but doing so doesn't give you the right to use that name commercially if it infringes the registered trade mark.
Your Privacy Policy specifically addresses how you collect, use, store, and share personal information. It's required under Australian privacy law if you handle personal data. Website Terms of Use govern broader interactions with your site—intellectual property, acceptable use, account terms, and general conditions. Both documents serve different purposes and you need both for a comprehensive legal framework.
Courts can refuse to enforce unfair contract terms, particularly in consumer relationships or where there's significant power imbalance. The goal isn't maximum protection regardless of fairness—it's balanced documentation that protects legitimate interests whilst maintaining reasonable client relationships.
You choose the registration period when you register—anywhere from 1 year to 25 years, or you can register for an indefinite period. For ongoing trading relationships, an indefinite registration makes sense. For single transactions, you might register for a specific period that covers your payment terms plus a buffer. The registration remains effective until it expires or until you discharge it.
The agreement should be detailed enough that if you stopped speaking to your collaborator, the document would still clearly explain your arrangement. Even trusted partners benefit from documented clarity. The agreement protects both parties' interests and typically strengthens rather than undermines good working relationships.
Your business may face claims for unpaid superannuation, annual leave, and other employment entitlements from when the relationship began. The Australian Taxation Office can pursue unpaid PAYG withholding and superannuation guarantee charges, including penalties and interest. Fair Work protections would also apply, meaning you'd need just cause for any termination and would face potential unfair dismissal claims. This is why getting the structure right initially matters—remedying misclassification retrospectively is expensive and complicated.
This depends on how long the information remains commercially sensitive. Technical specifications might need protection for several years as you develop and market products. Transaction-specific information might only need confidentiality until the deal completes or discussions conclude. Financial projections lose relevance as time passes. The duration should match how long disclosure would actually harm your interests, not just impose indefinite obligations that might be difficult to enforce.
Enforceability requires several elements: your terms must be brought to the client's attention before they accept your service, they need to be clearly worded, and they can't be unconscionable or unfair under consumer law.
Free templates provide starting points but rarely fit your specific business model. A template designed for e-commerce won't suit professional services. One created for US businesses won't address Australian law requirements. Templates often include irrelevant clauses while missing provisions you actually need. The better approach is having terms drafted to match how your site actually works.
You can and should remove content that's defamatory, false, or violates your documented moderation policy. The key is having that policy documented and applying it consistently. For potentially defamatory content, consider seeking legal advice before removal as defamation has specific legal meanings.
Yes, shareholders agreements can be implemented at any time, though it's easier when done early. Existing shareholders will need to agree to the terms and sign the agreement - this can be straightforward if everyone recognizes the value, or challenging if some shareholders see proposed terms as disadvantaging them. It's worth implementing even for existing companies, particularly before bringing in new shareholders, planning for exits, or addressing emerging governance issues.
This requires understanding how your property actually functions. Key characteristics to consider: Are building systems shared or separate? What's the age and condition of major equipment? Are utilities separately metered? How do common areas work and who benefits from them? Are there structural, heritage, or compliance constraints? What's the actual current condition? A commercial lease lawyer helps identify which characteristics matter for lease drafting and how provisions should be tailored to your property's operational realities.
You need approval from both. Your lease governs what alterations require landlord consent, but any work affecting common property or potentially breaching by-laws also requires owners corporation approval. Common property includes building structure, shared services, and external elements. In practice, this means most commercial fitouts need dual approval, which takes longer than single-landlord approval processes. Start the approval process early and confirm requirements with both parties before committing to contractors.
Yes, and this is common practice. You can specify that certain provisions - typically confidentiality, exclusivity, good faith negotiation, and cost-sharing arrangements - are immediately binding, while commercial terms remain non-binding until formal contracts are signed. The key is clearly identifying which clauses are binding.
Make-good obligations should be specific enough that both landlord and tenant would reach the same conclusion about what's required. Better practice is to itemise specific requirements: repainting (including how many coats and what areas), carpet condition or replacement, fixture repairs, removal of tenant installations, and any specific finishes or standards that apply. We can work through what specific make-good provisions make sense for your situation.
From a stamp duty perspective, both approaches result in the same liability. However, selling at market value may provide better asset protection and clearer documentation of the transaction terms. The CGT implications are also the same in both scenarios.
Starting work before documentation is finalized creates risk for both parties. If terms haven't been clearly agreed, you might find yourselves disputing what was actually agreed to when it's time to perform or pay. If you genuinely need to start before full documentation is ready, at minimum document the core commercial terms in writing—scope, payment, timing—and clearly state that detailed terms will follow. This at least creates a framework both parties have agreed to.
It depends on your contract. If your terms state that deliverables won't be transferred until payment is received, you have a clear right to withhold them. If your contract is silent on this, the situation becomes less clear—you might be obligated to deliver even if payment hasn't been made. The best approach is having this documented in your terms from the start.
Once you're registered, later applications for confusingly similar marks in your classes will likely face examination objections based on your earlier registration. Your registration date establishes your priority, and later applicants need to work around your registered mark.
This rarely works well. Terms from US or UK websites are written for different legal systems and don't address Australian Consumer Law requirements. They often try to exclude rights that can't be excluded in Australia, or include provisions that aren't enforceable here. It's better to have terms written for Australian law that reflect your actual business practices. We can work together to create terms that properly protect your business within the applicable legal framework.
Yes, and this often makes commercial sense. You might have different agreements for corporate versus individual clients, or different terms for ongoing retainers versus one-off projects. The key is maintaining consistent core protections whilst allowing flexibility for different relationship types.
This is a real concern because defective registrations can be challenged and may not be enforceable. The PPSA requires specific information including correct debtor details (legal name, ABN/ACN), collateral description, and secured party details. If you get these wrong, your registration may be considered seriously misleading and therefore defective. It's worth taking the time to get it right or working with someone who regularly handles PPSR registrations to ensure accuracy.
You can create an agreement at any point, though it's simpler to address expectations before work begins. If documenting an existing collaboration, focus on clarifying the current arrangement, who owns what's been created so far, and what terms will govern the collaboration going forward.
Not automatically. Under Australian copyright law, the person who creates original work owns the copyright unless there's an agreement that IP transfers to someone else. This is why explicit IP clauses are essential—they ensure work you're paying for becomes your business asset rather than remaining the contractor's property. I can help you draft IP provisions that properly transfer ownership and address any background IP the contractor uses.
Intent usually doesn't matter for breach—your confidentiality agreement likely establishes strict obligations regardless of whether breach was deliberate or careless. However, remedies might differ. Accidental disclosure to a single individual might warrant requiring immediate steps to retrieve information and prevent further distribution, while deliberate disclosure to competitors might justify seeking injunctive relief and damages.
Your standard terms are the operational clauses that apply across all your client relationships. They work together with project-specific details to create the complete contract. Think of standard terms as your operational framework.
Website T&Cs govern the relationship between you and users—what they can do on your site, what you're responsible for, payment terms, and dispute resolution. A privacy policy specifically addresses data collection, use, storage, and user rights regarding personal information. Most businesses need both, and they should be consistent with each other.
You're not automatically responsible for every review on third-party platforms. However, if you're actively using these platforms, monitoring them, and responding to reviews, you may need to take reasonable steps about misleading content you become aware of.
The company constitution generally takes precedence as the governing legal document for the company. However, shareholders agreements operate as binding contracts between shareholders personally. If conflicts exist, you'll want to amend one document to align with the other. Well-drafted shareholders agreements include provisions stating that they're subject to and read in conjunction with the constitution to minimize conflict risks.
You get ongoing disputes about whether standard clauses actually apply to your situation. Every maintenance issue becomes an argument about responsibility given your property's specific systems and condition. Cost recovery disputes arise when outgoings provisions don't match how expenses occur. Alteration requests create friction when standard clauses don't address your constraints. Make-good expectations differ when generic terms don't account for actual age and wear. These disputes happen regularly when lease terms don't fit property realities.
If a repair involves common property, the owners corporation is legally responsible for carrying out the work under the Strata Schemes Management Act. However, your lease likely makes your landlord responsible for maintaining the premises. This creates a situation where your landlord has the obligation to you, but must work through the owners corporation to fulfil it. Repairs can take longer as they require committee approval and the owners corporation's selected contractors. Your lease should address rent abatement if common property repairs make your premises unusable.
This creates a dispute that may require court determination. Courts will examine the language used, whether essential terms are complete, evidence of parties' intentions, and how you both behaved after signing. This uncertainty is costly and time-consuming, which is why clear drafting matters.
The best approach depends on your circumstances and risk appetite, but all review mechanisms must be unambiguous, mathematically workable and consistent with other lease terms. Fixed percentage increases provide certainty, CPI-linked reviews move with inflation, and market reviews can be more favourable in softening markets. Let's work through the options together to find a review mechanism that suits your circumstances.
In my experience, these transfers typically take 6-8 weeks from documentation to registration, assuming all parties are ready to proceed and there are no complex title issues. The timeline can extend if we need to resolve taxation or family agreement matters.
The value and complexity of the arrangement should guide the level of documentation, but even simple deals benefit from clear written terms. Most business disputes I handle aren't about complex transactions—they're about straightforward arrangements where terms weren't documented clearly enough. The question isn't whether you need documentation, it's what level of documentation matches the risk and value of your specific deal. We can work through what makes sense for your situation.
The PPSR is a national register where you can record security interests in personal property (including goods you've supplied on credit). If you supply goods and retain ownership until payment, registering on the PPSR gives you priority over other creditors if your client becomes insolvent. Without registration, you might lose your goods to other creditors even though technically you still own them. PPSR protection requires clear contract terms and proper registration before or shortly after delivery.
This depends on how you use your branding. Many businesses register a word mark covering the business name in any presentation, and a device mark covering the specific logo design. Registering both provides comprehensive protection.
Review your documents whenever your business model changes—adding new products, changing refund policies, moving to a new platform, or starting international sales. Also review when Australian Consumer Law or privacy legislation changes. At minimum, do an annual review to ensure your terms still match your operational reality. Terms that don't reflect how you actually operate create legal risk rather than reducing it.
Enforcement options depend on the breach. For payment issues, you might suspend work, charge interest, or commence debt recovery. For scope breaches, your variation provisions create clear documentation about what's actually agreed. Having well-drafted terms makes enforcement considerably more straightforward.
You can register at any time, but your priority position depends on when you register. If you're claiming a PMSI in inventory, you need to register within 15 business days after delivery to get super priority. If you register later, you'll still have a registered interest, but you'll only have priority from the date of registration—meaning anyone who registered before you will rank ahead. For this reason, establishing a process to register promptly after delivery protects each transaction properly.
Collaboration agreements typically align with project timeframes. For ongoing collaborations without a defined end date, consider including an initial term such as 12 months with automatic renewal unless either party provides notice. Include terms for reviewing and updating the agreement periodically as circumstances change.
You can include restraint provisions in your contractor agreement, but they need to be reasonable to be enforceable. Courts balance your legitimate business interests against the contractor's right to earn a living. A well-drafted restraint might prevent a contractor from working for direct competitors in your specific geographic area or market segment for a reasonable period, particularly if they've accessed confidential information or trade secrets. Let's discuss what's reasonable for your specific situation.
Not directly. Confidentiality obligations prevent disclosure of your confidential information, but they don't stop people from changing employers or working in the same industry. If you want to restrict where former employees can work, you need restraint of trade provisions, which are separate from and more complex than confidentiality obligations.
Generally, you can't unilaterally change terms for existing relationships - changes require mutual agreement. New terms typically apply to new work or new engagements.
They should be easily accessible and visible at key user interaction points. Link to your T&Cs in your footer, but also ensure users see and agree to them before submitting forms, creating accounts, making purchases, or booking services. For e-commerce, require checkbox acceptance during checkout. For contact forms, include a statement about agreeing to your terms and privacy policy.
Your policy should be specific enough that someone could apply it consistently. Rather than "we remove unhelpful reviews," say what makes a review unhelpful—for example, reviews containing profanity, reviews from non-customers, spam, defamatory content, or reviews that violate privacy.
For the agreement to be effective, all shareholders should sign. Some agreements allow for new shareholders to be added by having them sign a deed of accession. If a shareholder refuses to sign, the agreement can still bind those who do sign, but it won't restrict the non-signing shareholder's actions. For this reason, shareholders agreements often include provisions making signing a condition of becoming or remaining a shareholder.
Even if the physical property is similar, this creates problems. The property's condition has changed - equipment is older, fixtures show more wear, systems may have been modified. The previous tenant's needs were different, so provisions tailored to that tenancy may not fit. Cost structures have shifted. NSW leasing law evolves. Most importantly, your new tenant's business and operational needs are different - lease terms should account for how they'll actually use the property's characteristics, not how the previous tenant did.
Yes. By-laws are legally binding on all lot owners and occupiers, including tenants. They can restrict operating hours, noise levels, waste management, vehicle access, and even certain business types. Review the current by-laws before signing your lease to confirm your intended use is permitted. Ask about any proposed by-law amendments and whether there's a history of by-law enforcement in the building. Your lease should require the landlord to provide you with current by-laws and any amendments during the lease term.
It depends on the complexity of your transaction and the consequences of getting it wrong. For significant transactions, complex commercial arrangements, or situations where you need certain obligations to be binding, legal guidance ensures your document matches your intentions. The cost of proper drafting is typically far less than the cost of later disputes.
Whether tenant fitout becomes the landlord's property depends on both property law principles about fixtures and what the lease specifically provides. This matters because it affects who insures the fitout, impacts make-good obligations, affects valuation and finance, and impacts tax treatment. Your lease should clearly address fitout ownership to avoid complications.
Yes, you can transfer a percentage interest in property to family members. This approach can help manage stamp duty and CGT liabilities while allowing you to retain some ownership and control. The same legal requirements apply to partial transfers.
How much should I expect to pay for business agreement documentation?
Should I use a debt recovery agency or go straight to legal action?
Can I register a trade mark if I'm planning to use it but haven't started yet?
Do my terms need to be accepted by customers before they can purchase?
Should my service agreement include confidentiality provisions?
What's the difference between a security interest and a PPS lease?
Can one party end the collaboration early and what protection do I have if my collaborator withdraws?
What should I do if a contractor isn't meeting the agreed standards?
Do mutual confidentiality agreements mean we're both equally at risk?
My business model is changing - do I need to update my standard terms?
How often should I update my website T&Cs?
Can I ask customers to remove or edit negative reviews?
How much does a shareholders agreement cost to prepare?
What's the difference between retail and commercial leases under NSW law?
How long does owners corporation approval take for commercial fitout?
How does this apply to retail leases in NSW?
How do I know if the permitted use clause is appropriate for my business?
What happens if my child can't afford the stamp duty on a property transfer?